<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=1056215754466548&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
280 W River Park Drive Suite 110 Provo, UT

Back to Blog

Content

    SAINT™ Depression Treatment: 79% Remission in One Week (and How fMRI-Guided TMS Compares)

    Image of Dr. Mark Allen, Ph.D.
    Updated on 02 June, 2026
    Medically Reviewed by

    Dr. Diane Spangler, Ph.D.

    SAINT™ Depression Treatment: 79% Remission in One Week (and How fMRI-Guided TMS Compares)
    13:40

    Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been FDA-approved for treating major depressive disorder (MDD) since 2008 and is a well-established treatment option, especially for patients who haven’t responded to antidepressant medications.
     Cognitive FX is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or licensed to provide SAINT®. SAINT® and the Stanford Neuromodulation Therapy protocol are owned by Stanford University and licensed exclusively to Magnus Medical. We provide our own fMRI-guided iTBS protocol — read on for how it differs. 

    Is Your TMS Target Actually in the Right Place?

    See why the difference between a population average and your exact brain coordinate can determine whether treatment works

    Building brain model…
    Drag to rotate  •  Scroll to zoom  •  Click a marker to explore
    X (mm) Y (mm)
    Z auto-positioned to nearest cortical surface
    Please enter valid MNI coordinates.
    Treatment Outcomes: Standard TMS vs. fMRI-Guided TMS
    Treatment-resistant depression populations
    100%75%50%25%0%
    50%
    78%
    Response Rate
    33%
    79%
    Remission Rate
    Standard TMS (scalp-based targeting) fMRI-Guided TMS (personalized targeting)
    1 Cole EJ et al. Stanford Neuromodulation Therapy (SNT): A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Psychiatry. 2022;179(2):132–141. PMID 34711062. (Response 85.7%, Remission 78.6% in fMRI-guided group; ~50% response / ~33% remission for standard rTMS per FDA trial data cited therein.)
    2 Shahi N et al. Naturalistic Outcomes with fMRI-Guided and Non-fMRI-Guided Accelerated TMS for Depression. medRxiv. 2025. doi:10.1101/2025.09.03.25334813. (Real-world: fMRI-guided 77.5% vs. standard 62% response; 2.3× odds of response with fMRI guidance, n=195.)
    3 O’Reardon JP et al. Efficacy and Safety of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Acute Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder. Biol Psychiatry. 2007;62(11):1208–1216. PMID 17573044. (Standard rTMS ~33% remission in pivotal FDA trial.)

    What Most Clinics Do

    • Uses skull measurements or EEG landmarks
    • No brain imaging — one coordinate for everyone
    • Target can land up to 3cm from your actual circuit
    • If it doesn’t work, most clinics have no way to know why

    What CFX Does

    • fMRI maps the specific circuit driving your depression
    • Finds your exact DLPFC coordinate — not a population average
    • Accounts for how your anatomy differs from everyone else
    • If the first treatment doesn’t land perfectly, we can adjust

    Standard TMS protocols use a single coordinate derived from population averages. That coordinate may be centimeters away from the specific spot in your prefrontal cortex that connects to your depression circuit. When the target is off, the magnetic pulse stimulates tissue that isn’t driving your depression — and treatment fails, not because TMS doesn’t work, but because it didn’t treat your brain.

    This is likely the most common reason people try TMS and feel like it “didn’t work.” The technology worked. The address was wrong.

    Look at the dots on the brain above. The spread between the population-average targets and any custom coordinate you place represents real anatomical variance — variance that determines treatment outcome.

    Before your first pulse, Cognitive FX runs a resting-state fMRI scan. That scan maps the connectivity between your prefrontal cortex and the subgenual cingulate — the specific circuit that drives depression. We find the exact voxel in your DLPFC with the strongest connection to that circuit. That voxel becomes your treatment coordinate.

    No other clinic in Utah does this. Most TMS providers pick a coordinate from a chart and apply the same protocol to every patient. We treat the brain in front of us.

    Use the panel on the left to enter approximate coordinates and see where your target might fall — or schedule a consultation and we’ll find your exact location with imaging.

    The data is clear: fMRI-guided targeting produces significantly better outcomes than scalp-based methods. If you’re considering TMS for depression, the question isn’t whether imaging guidance matters. It’s whether your provider is using it. Talk to us before you start treatment.
    Talk to a CFX Specialist →

     Cognitive FX is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or licensed to provide SAINT®. SAINT® and the Stanford Neuromodulation Therapy protocol are owned by Stanford University and licensed exclusively to Magnus Medical. We provide our own fMRI-guided iTBS protocol — read on for how it differs. These results were observed in a Stanford-run trial using the SAINT® protocol. Cognitive FX has not published equivalent trial data and does not claim to reproduce these outcomes. 

    However, the standard protocol — repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) — has notable limitations:

    • Lengthy treatment: rTMS requires daily sessions over 4–6 weeks, making it difficult to complete alongside work and life commitments.

    • Lack of precision: Coil placement relies on manual measurement, leading to inconsistencies affecting treatment effectiveness.

    • Moderate success rates: While rTMS has higher response and remission rates than antidepressant medications, only about one-third of patients achieve full remission.

    To address these challenges, Nolan Williams and his team at Stanford University developed a faster, more effective TMS approach called Stanford Accelerated Intelligent Neuromodulation Therapy (SAINT™ or SNT).

    In this article, we’ll discuss how SAINT™ differs from conventional TMS and why it may be a breakthrough option for you.

    We cover:


    SAINT™ vs. Conventional TMS: What Makes It Different?

    Approved in 2022 by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for treating treatment-resistant depression, SAINT™ is currently the safest and most efficient type of TMS. Treatment resistance is defined as a lack of improvement after multiple interventions, including antidepressant medications and even electroconvulsive therapy (ECT).

    Like all forms of TMS, SAINT uses a magnetic coil placed over the patient’s head to stimulate neuronal activity. The coil generates low-frequency magnetic pulses to regulate activity in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), a region of the brain crucial for mood regulation.

    SAINT differs from conventional TMS in three key ways:

    1. Use of intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS)

      SAINT TMS utilizes intermittent theta-burst stimulation, a form of brain stimulation that uses a different pulse frequency and pattern, delivering treatment in shorter sessions. The SAINT treatment protocol consists of 10-minute sessions, compared to the 37-minute sessions of rTMS.

    2. Precise targeting with fMRI and neuronavigation

      One of the key distinctions of the SAINT protocol is the use of neuroimaging and neuronavigation for precision targeting. A functional MRI scan locates the target area of the brain (the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, or DLPFC), while neuronavigation ensures the magnetic coil is placed accurately for every treatment session.

      This precise targeting is vital for effectiveness, as even a slight misplacement of the coil can diminish results. In contrast, other TMS methods, like rTMS and standard iTBS, often rely on less precise methods for coil placement, such as manual measurements taken over the patient’s scalp.

    3. Condensed treatment schedule

      SAINT TMS is administered over a condensed one-week period, with 10 short sessions per day for 5 consecutive days, totaling 50 sessions.

      This compressed treatment schedule makes it more convenient for patients who might find it challenging to commit to the longer durations of other TMS protocols, such as the 4–6 week timeframe of rTMS.

    These innovations make SAINT faster, more precise, and more effective than conventional TMS.

    SAINT™ Produces the Highest Response and Remission Rates of All TMS Options

    A comparison of remission rates for rTMS/iTBS, electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), and SAINT-iTBS.
    A comparison of remission rates for rTMS/iTBS, electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), and SAINT-iTBS. These results were observed in a Stanford-run trial using the SAINT® protocol. Cognitive FX has not published equivalent trial data and does not claim to reproduce these outcomes. 

    SAINT TMS is considered the "gold standard" treatment for treatment-resistant depression. Clinical trials showing SAINT TMS to be highly effective include:

    • High response rate: In a double-blind, randomized controlled trial, about 85.7% of patients responded to SAINT treatment, meeting pre-defined criteria for a reduction in depressive symptoms.

    • High remission rate: 78.6% of patients in the same trial met the criteria for remission, indicating a significant decrease or disappearance of depression signs and symptoms.

    • Rapid-acting: These results were achieved in just one week of treatment, making SAINT one of the fastest-acting depression treatment options available. A month after treatment, 60% of trial participants remained in remission.

    While the original form of TMS can improve symptoms in about 50% of patients, with over 30% achieving remission, SAINT boasts significantly higher success rates. With SAINT, 90% of patients who previously didn’t respond to conventional TMS achieved remission in just three to five days.

    Note: Learn more about how SAINT TMS compares to ECT and ketamine therapy.

    SAINT™: A Safe Procedure with Mild Short-Term Side Effects

    SAINT is a safe, noninvasive, outpatient treatment, with most patients experiencing only mild and short-lived side effects.

    As with all forms of TMS, the most common side effects include headaches, dizziness, and mild discomfort at the stimulation site or in the facial muscles during treatment.

    Less common side effects — though still generally mild — may include gastrointestinal discomfort, muscle twitching, insomnia, tinnitus, or fainting. These effects typically subside within the first few sessions and can often be managed with over-the-counter pain relievers.

    One key advantage of SAINT over traditional TMS is its lower risk of seizures. While the seizure risk with standard TMS is already low (fewer than 3 cases per 100,000 sessions), SAINT further reduces this risk by using a lower stimulation intensity — 80% of the brain’s motor threshold compared to 110%–120% used in rTMS. This adjustment makes SAINT an even safer option for patients.

    Are You a Good Candidate for SAINT™ Treatment?

    If you’ve been dealing with treatment-resistant depression and other treatments have failed to work or produced unpleasant side effects, SAINT treatment could be a great option for you.

    However, while TMS is safe and effective for most patients with major depression, certain medical conditions may make it unsuitable, including:

    • Metal implants in the head: TMS is not recommended for patients with metal implants near the treatment area, such as cochlear implants, internal pulse generators, medication pumps, aneurysm clips or coils, stents, or bullet fragments. While braces and dental fillings are safe, metal objects in the brain can overheat or malfunction due to the magnetic field, posing serious risks.

    • History of seizures: Though rare, seizures can occur during TMS, especially in individuals with epilepsy, multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer’s disease, or a history of seizures. Discussing your medical history and medications with a doctor can help minimize risks.

    • Certain prescription medications: Some medications may increase seizure risk. While no direct evidence suggests TMS significantly raises this risk, patients on such medications should consult their healthcare provider to determine if adjustments or closer monitoring are needed.

    If you have any of these conditions or concerns, it's crucial to consult with a healthcare professional. They can assess your medical history, current condition, and individual needs to determine if SAINT TMS is right for you.

    Practical Barriers That May Affect Access to SAINT™ TMS

    Beyond medical factors, some patients may also face practical barriers to treatment, such as insurance coverage limitations, cost, or geographical constraints. If these apply to you, discussing alternative options with your provider may help you explore solutions.

    While SAINT offers significant advantages over traditional TMS, the following may make it less accessible:

    • Lack of insurance coverage: Most insurance plans do not yet cover SAINT, as it is a newer protocol compared to standard TMS. However, coverage policies vary, so it’s important to check with your insurance provider to confirm your options. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) have announced that hospitals will be reimbursed $19,703 for the full SAINT™ protocol, beginning July 1, 2025.

    • High treatment costs: Currently, SAINT TMS treatments range from $30,000 to $36,000, making the cost a significant barrier for many patients. There are, however, close alternatives available at a significantly lower price (discussed below).

    • Limited availability: Fewer than 10 clinics in the U.S. currently offer SAINT, with most providers still using rTMS. However, more clinics are beginning to adopt accelerated TMS and intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) protocols, signaling a gradual shift toward newer treatment methods.

    If you’re considering SAINT, discussing financial and logistical concerns with your provider can help you explore potential solutions, such as financing options or alternative treatment locations.

    Accelerated fMRI TMS: A SAINT™ Alternative for One-Third of the Price

    Our clinic, based in Provo, Utah, provides an alternative to SAINT TMS that offers the same precision of personalized treatment targeting, combined with FDA-approved theta burst stimulation at a significantly lower cost. This approach delivers the same core elements that make SAINT so revolutionary.

    The only difference between our treatment and SAINT™ (a trademark licensed to Stanford Medical) is our targeting method. Our target locations are determined by fMRI and our prescribing neuroscientist and physician, rather than their proprietary software.

    Comparison Chart

    Accelerated fMRI - TMS vs. Magnus SAINT™ TMS

    Accelerated fMRI - TMS Magnus SAINT™ TMS
    FDA-Approved iTBS
    FDA-Approved Neuronavigators
    FDA-Approved Figure 8 Coils
    Number of Treatment Days 5 5
    Treatments per Day 10 10
    Total Treatments 50 50
    Number of TMS Pulses Approx. 90,000 90,000
    Resting motor threshold pulse intensity 90–120% 90–120%
    FDA-Approved Personalized DLPFC Targeting
    Personalized DLPFC Targeting Assists Doctor in Target Location
    Personalized E Field Coil orientation
    Cost $9,000 to $12,000 $30,000+

     

    DISCLAIMER: SAINT™ is a trademark of The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University (“Stanford”) and has exclusively licensed such mark to Magnus Medical. Cognitive FX is neither endorsed by Stanford nor utilizes Magnus Medical equipment nor claims to be offering the SAINT™ protocol as prescribed by Stanford University et. al. or Magnus Medical.  We provide fMRI-guided intermittent theta burst TMS with target locations determined by fMRI and our prescribing physician.These results were observed in a Stanford-run trial using the SAINT® protocol. Cognitive FX has not published equivalent trial data and does not claim to reproduce these outcomes. 

    As we’ve highlighted throughout this article, this protocol of TMS is:

    • Safe: Widely tolerated and associated with mild, short-lasting side effects.

    • Precise: fMRI ensures that the treatment target area is precisely located for each patient, accounting for variations in head size and shape. Neuronavigation ensures the magnetic coil is placed over that exact spot for every treatment session.

    • Fast: Treatment courses are reduced to a single week, making it easier to complete alongside life and work commitments (compared to 4 to 6 weeks of standard TMS and acceleratedTMS protocols).

    • Effective: Precision coil placement combined with theta burst stimulation produces the best TMS treatment results to date.

    To improve outcomes for our patients, we also include cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) as a part of our treatment. When combined with the traditional method of TMS (rTMS), CBT improved response and remission rates by ~8% and ~19%, respectively. Additionally, CBT is likely to produce sustained improvement over time once treatment has concluded.

    Our brain stimulation treatment is ideal for most patients with treatment-resistant depression. However, we do not treat patients under the age of 18 or over 65. Additionally, as a safety measure, we do not treat patients who have a history of seizures or who are currently actively suicidal and in need of crisis care.

    Click here to learn more about receiving accelerated fMRI TMS therapy at Cognitive FX.

    Cited Research


    SAINT TMS Locations: Where Can You Get SAINT Treatment?

    SAINT® TMS Clinic Locations (and What an fMRI-Guided Alternative Looks Like)

    Access to SAINT™ TMS in the U.S. remains extremely limited, with fewer than ten clinics currently offering the protocol. On top of that, the cost often exceeding $30,000 and has limited insurance...

    Read the full article
    TMS vs. tDCS for Depression: Which Is Better?

    TMS vs. tDCS for Depression: Which Is Better?

    For many people living with major depression, antidepressant medications either don’t work or only get them part of the way to recovery. Symptoms may ease for a while, but then return, or never fully...

    Read the full article
    Side Effects of TMS: Do the Benefits Outweigh the Risks?

    Side Effects of TMS: Do the Benefits Outweigh the Risks?

    If you’re considering transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) therapy, you may be concerned about its side effects and whether the benefits outweigh any risks. 

    Read the full article
    Compare the Top Fast-Acting Depression Treatments: Effectiveness, Time Frames & Side Effects

    Fast-Acting Antidepressants: Compare Options & Effectiveness

    Traditional antidepressant medications involve a trial period of weeks or months before it can be determined whether or not they are working. If a medication doesn’t work — and it’s been shown that ...

    Read the full article
    Is SAINT™ TMS Right for Me? What It Is & Factors to Consider

    Is SAINT™ TMS Right for Me? What It Is & Factors to Consider & Alternatives

    If you suffer from major depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), or other mental health conditions, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been proven to help. You may want to explore...

    Read the full article
    SAINT Treatment Cost vs. Alternatives: What’s the Best Option?

    SAINT Treatment Cost vs. Alternatives: What’s the Best Option?

    Fewer than ten locations in the United States currently offer SAINT™ treatment for individuals with treatment-resistant depression. Among the clinics that publicly share pricing, the out-of-pocket...

    Read the full article